DELIVERABLE D1.2 / D2.2

Experimental Campaign Design

Phase 5: Dynamic Shaking Table Tests

PROJECT
EasyWall (COMPETE2030)
FOCUS
System ID & Seismic Collapse Mechanisms
PRESENTER
Osama Amer, Amirhossein Mohammadi, José Sena-Cruz
STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
Phase 5 Objectives & Scope

GLOBAL SYSTEM GOAL

To evaluate the ultimate collapse mechanisms, time-dependent dynamic instability, and spatial load redistribution of a complete 3D EPSB-RC structural system under realistic, multi-level earthquake excitation.

TARGET MECHANISMS

  • Torsional Coupling: Exploiting severe geometric asymmetry (Center of Mass vs. Center of Rigidity) to induce massive dynamic torsional moments ($M_t$).
  • Spandrel & Lintel Mechanics: Observing damage progression (diagonal tension / flexural hinging) in short coupling beams bridging windows and doors.
  • System Identification: Tracking period elongation ($T_1$) and equivalent viscous damping degradation ($\xi$) via white noise excitation.
3D Dynamic Shaking Excitation
SPECIMEN GEOMETRY
3D Asymmetric Prototype Design

ENGINEERING CONTEXT

The design intentionally introduces severe spatial asymmetry. E4 is a solid shear wall, while E1, E2, and E3 feature distinct fenestrations. This skews the Center of Rigidity (CR) away from the Center of Mass (CM).

SETUP SUMMARY

  • Footprint: $3000 \times 3000 \text{ mm}$.
  • Height: 2 stories ($H_{tot} = 6750 \text{ mm}$).
  • Diaphragms: Cast-in-place RC slabs ensuring absolute in-plane rigidity.

MASS SIMULATION

Because EPSB-RC walls are highly optimized, supplementary steel/lead ingots are bolted to the slabs to scale the total seismic weight ($W$) to match realistic $0.10 f_{ck}$ stress levels in the 1st-story ribs.

Asymmetric Wall Fenestrations (E1-E4)
INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS (IDA)
Seismic Excitation Protocol

ENGINEERING CONTEXT

To systematically drive the structure from the elastic domain through to ultimate collapse using spectrally matched natural accelerograms (PEER NGA-West2).

LOADING SEQUENCE

  • White Noise (0.05g RMS): Extracts evolving natural frequencies before and after every major run.
  • SLE (Serviceability): Verifies elastic uncracked behavior.
  • DBE (Design Basis): Maps controlled plastic hinging.
  • MCE (Max Considered): Evaluates ultimate collapse prevention and structural robustness.
Multi-Level Earthquake Accelerograms
CRITICAL METHODOLOGY
Advanced Instrumentation: DIC vs. LVDT

3D DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION (DIC)

Mandatory for 3D dynamic testing. As the entire building translates, rocks, and twists simultaneously, physical LVDTs are fundamentally flawed.

  • Eliminating "Cosine Errors": Traditional LVDTs attached to stationary reference frames lose accuracy as the target points move out-of-plane (torsional warping). DIC inherently calculates true 3D spatial coordinates ($X, Y, Z$), entirely eliminating cosine errors.
  • Focus Zones: Cameras will map the complex shear lag at the 3D corner joints and the dynamic web crippling in the asymmetric door/window spandrels.

HYBRID SENSOR DEPLOYMENT

While DIC maps the external strain fields, internal mechanical sensors are strictly required to monitor the "Interface Integrity Constraint".

  • Internal Interface LVDTs: Must be anchored through the EPS into the concrete core at the base of the solid E4 wall to measure delamination/slip under violent dynamic reversals.
  • Triaxial Accelerometers: Deployed at the geometric center and extreme corners of every slab to map absolute accelerations and the exact torsional yaw ($\ddot{\theta}_z$).
  • String Potentiometers: Used to measure global inter-story drifts ($\Delta_{story}$), acknowledging minor acceptable tolerances for twisting.
PART 4: LOGISTICS
Phase 5 Demands & Instrumentation Matrix
SYNTAX: DYN - [PROTOCOL] - [TOPOLOGY] - [VARIABLES] (e.g., DYN-STB-BLD-MCE = Dynamic Shaking Table, 3D Building Prototype, MCE Level)
Structural Parameter Predicted Demand / Max Value Primary Instrumentation Mechanism
Total Seismic Weight ($W$) $\approx 28 \text{ Tons}$ (Slabs & Supp. Mass) Load cells on shaking table actuators
Max Base Shear ($V_{base}$) $\approx 110.0 \text{ kN}$ Derived from floor accelerometers $\times$ mass
Overturning Moment (OTM) $\approx 520.0 \text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}$ Table foundation load cells
Max Inter-Story Drift $\pm 80\text{ mm}$ (per floor) String Potentiometers + 3D DIC Tracking
Torsional Warping & Strain Extreme corner shear lag 3D DIC Multi-Camera Array
Floor Accelerations Up to $1.5g$ at roof level Triaxial Accelerometers (Corners & Center)